---
title: "The new document is born from what is already yours."
seo_title: "Create new documents from what you already produced | SazAI"
description: "The new document is refined from your company's body of knowledge, each passage with its provenance, human in the loop."
tags: [marketing, dimensao/crie]
icon: sparkles
---

> Reusing what already exists instead of starting from zero changes the starting point of a new presentation. That is what generation is being built for: the new document comes out of the body of knowledge your company has already produced, and every passage points to where it came from.

<div class="chap">

<div class="ico-col"><sz-icon style="color:var(--verb-create)" name="sparkles" size="36"></sz-icon></div>

<h2 id="from-your-knowledge">From your knowledge, not from nothing</h2>

<h3 class="sub">The new comes from what already exists in your vault, and the page states where the capability stands</h3>

Ask for a deck, a section, a summary. The design is for SazAI Corpus to compose from your own
body of knowledge, the presentations, analyses and translations that already live in your vault,
and not from a generic model's idea of your business. The content is yours, distilled: your
numbers, your terminology, your voice, assembled into something new, every passage with its
<dfn data-hint="Where each passage of the new document came from: the presentation, the section, the sheet in your vault that backs it.">provenance</dfn>.

<figure class="viz duo" role="group" aria-label="The body of knowledge feeds a new document, every passage carrying its origin">
<div class="side"><svg viewBox="0 0 90 70" aria-hidden="true"><g fill="none" stroke="var(--lightgray)" stroke-width="1.5"><circle cx="20" cy="16" r="7"/><circle cx="12" cy="42" r="7"/><circle cx="30" cy="60" r="7"/><circle cx="52" cy="36" r="7"/><line x1="20" y1="16" x2="52" y2="36"/><line x1="12" y1="42" x2="52" y2="36"/><line x1="30" y1="60" x2="52" y2="36"/></g></svg><b>what you already know</b><span>the whole vault</span></div>
<div class="mid"><svg viewBox="0 0 60 70" aria-hidden="true"><line x1="6" y1="35" x2="48" y2="35" stroke="var(--verb-create)" stroke-width="1.5"/><path d="M42 29l6 6-6 6" fill="none" stroke="var(--verb-create)" stroke-width="1.5"/></svg></div>
<div class="side"><svg viewBox="0 0 90 70" aria-hidden="true"><rect x="16" y="8" width="58" height="54" rx="5" fill="none" stroke="var(--dark)" stroke-width="1.5"/><line x1="26" y1="24" x2="64" y2="24" stroke="var(--lightgray)" stroke-width="1.5"/><line x1="26" y1="36" x2="64" y2="36" stroke="var(--lightgray)" stroke-width="1.5"/><line x1="26" y1="48" x2="50" y2="48" stroke="var(--lightgray)" stroke-width="1.5"/></svg><b>the new document</b><span>each passage with its origin</span></div>
<figcaption>The new is born from what you already have, and every passage points to where it came from.</figcaption>
</figure>

This is the least mature operation in the set, and the page says so before you find out. That is
why it carries no number and no verb of its own in the present tense for the capability:
translate and compare sell as ready, create sells as maturing. Whatever ships appears in the
[platform roadmap](platform) on the day it appears, and not before.

<div class="bound"><p><b>The state, said in full and before you ask.</b> Measured on 2026-09-02, in the development environment and not in production, which is the only boundary this sentence can claim: the write-run log is empty across all four formats, and the write step does not appear in the history of steps executed. The engine exists, the log is empty, and the two together are the state.</p></div>

</div>

<div class="chap">

<div class="ico-col"><sz-icon style="color:var(--verb-create)" name="users" size="36"></sz-icon></div>

<h2 id="co-creation">Co-creation with AI</h2>

<h3 class="sub">The material is yours, the decision is yours, and what the machine brings is the assembly</h3>

The word co-creation names a division of labor, not a decoration. You bring the material and the
judgment; the assembly arrives with the origin of every passage attached, and what is not in
your body of knowledge does not appear.

Where the new document is assembled from, why the blank space where an answer would fit is
honest information, and why the signature stays with whoever reviewed it, are in
[co-creation with AI](co-creation).

</div>

<div class="chap">

<div class="ico-col"><sz-icon style="color:var(--verb-create)" name="file" size="36"></sz-icon></div>

<h2 id="web-editor">Web editor</h2>

<h3 class="sub">Fixing the slide on the screen where you read it, and the gap that still separates that</h3>

The screen that shows your slide and the engine that writes your file already exist, and
connecting them is not a matter of wiring: what passes between the two today is a rendering of
the page, and a rendering does not hold the identity of the elements the engine needs to write
back in the right place.

Why element identity is what makes a change addressable, and exactly where the missing piece is,
are in [web editor](web-editor).

</div>

<div class="chap">

<div class="ico-col"><sz-icon style="color:var(--verb-create)" name="chat" size="36"></sz-icon></div>

<h2 id="agentic-editor">Agentic editor</h2>

<h3 class="sub">Asking for the change in words, without the model touching the file</h3>

The obvious way to edit by conversation is to let the model touch your document, and that is
exactly the one this house refused. Your request, in your own words, becomes a specification,
and a request the engine cannot resolve to a concrete element in your material fails instead of
being guessed.

How the request becomes a specification, why editing inherits the refusal that translation
already proves, and what asymmetry remains today between reading and changing, are in
[agentic editor](agentic-editor).

</div>

What you have already produced keeps being what you [see](see), [ask](talk) and
[translate](translate). And all of it, done or still to do, is recorded: it is the fifth,
[trust](trust).
